Independent Evaluation of Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+): Final Report Findings at a Glance
Download
Key Findings
- While CPC+ reduced emergency department (ED) visits, acute inpatient hospitalizations, and acute inpatient expenditures, these reductions were not sufficient in either track to reduce total Medicare expenditures or achieve net savings, after accounting for increased expenditures in other areas, such as physician services, inpatient rehabilitation, and hospice, and enhanced CPC+ payments.
- We did not observe any systematic differences in primary outcomes between Track 1 and Track 2 practices despite greater funding and care delivery requirements for Track 2 practices.
- Independent practices and those participating in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (SSP) at baseline tended to have more favorable results.
- CPC+ practices cited care management fees as the most useful type of CPC+ payment support they received, used primarily to fund the salaries of care managers, behavioral health care providers, and other staff to improve care delivery.
The Independent Evaluation of Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+): Final Report Findings at a Glance provides a brief overview of the independent evaluation’s findings about the five years of CPC+ for the 2,905 practices in regions that began CPC+ in 2017.
The final report on the evaluation can be found at Independent Evaluation of Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+): Final Report, which describes (1) engagement in CPC+ by payer partners and health IT vendors and participation by practices; (2) the supports practices received; (3) how practices implemented CPC+ and changed the way they delivered health care; and (4) the impacts of CPC+ on cost, service use, limited claims-based quality-of-care outcomes, and patient experience for attributed Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries.
More like this from Mathematica
How do you apply evidence?
Take our quick four-question survey to help us curate evidence and insights that serve you.
Take our survey