Projects

Evaluation of the Networks for School Improvement Initiative

2020 – 2026

Project Overview

Objective

To evaluate the Gates Foundation’s portfolio of Networks for School Improvement (NSI) grants, which supported the use of network-based continuous improvement (CI) in schools.

Project Motivation

The use of network-based CI in education has grown substantially in recent years. This approach involves a network of schools using CI to iteratively test and refine strategies that address a common challenge, while learning from one another. The Gates Foundation established the NSI initiative to scale up network-based CI and increase the proportion of students on track for high school graduation and college enrollment. The foundation sponsored an evaluation of the NSI initiative to provide much-needed evidence on the implementation and impact of network-based CI.

Partners in Progress

Redstone Strategy Group and New York University partnered with Mathematica to study the impact of the initiative. As part of the evaluation, RAND led a study on the implementation of school networks (learn more about RAND’s research here), and the American Institutes for Research (AIR) led a study on CI implementation (learn more about AIR’s research here).

Prepared For

The Gates Foundation

Evaluating whether the use of network-based continuous improvement in education can improve student outcomes.

The Gates Foundation’s Networks for School Improvement (NSI) initiative supported networks of schools that used continuous improvement (CI) methods to iteratively test and refine strategies addressing a common challenge, while learning from one another. The foundation awarded more than $300 million in five-year grants to intermediary organizations that led 34 NSIs across roughly 150 districts and charter networks.

The foundation sponsored an evaluation to build evidence on the impact and implementation of the NSI approach. The evaluation addressed three research questions, each explored by a different evaluation partner:

  1. How do intermediaries design and implement their NSI (RAND)?
  2. To what extent do participating schools implement CI activities (American Institutes for Research)?
  3. What is the impact of the NSI on student outcomes? What aspects of the NSI approach are related to impacts on students (Mathematica)?

A summary report that describes findings across these research questions can be found here. Also available are reports describing (1) how intermediaries designed and implemented their NSI (here), (2) how participating schools implemented CI (here), (3) how these aspects of implementation are related (here), and (4) the impact of the NSI on student outcomes (here).

Related Staff

Matthew Johnson

Matthew Johnson

Senior Researcher

View Bio Page
Naihobe Gonzalez

Naihobe Gonzalez

Senior Researcher

View Bio Page
Jeffrey  Max

Jeffrey Max

Director, Business Development

View Bio Page
Michelle  Bennett

Michelle Bennett

Research Analyst

View Bio Page

Efficiency Meets Impact.
That's Progress Together.

To solve their most pressing challenges, organizations turn to Mathematica for deeply integrated expertise. We bring together subject matter and policy experts, data scientists, methodologists, and technologists who work across topics and sectors to help our partners design, improve, and scale evidence-based solutions.

Work With Us