Why Primary Care Practitioners Aren’t Joining Value-Based Payment Models: Reasons and Potential Solutions

Why Primary Care Practitioners Aren’t Joining Value-Based Payment Models: Reasons and Potential Solutions

Published: Jul 17, 2024
Publisher: The Commonwealth Fund

Issue

During the past 14 years, the federal government and states have fielded numerous value-based payment (VBP) models for primary care to move away from a fee-for-service payment model that incentivizes the delivery of more services over better-quality care. However, most primary care practitioners (PCPs) do not participate in VBP models, and the reasons are largely unknown.

Goals

Learn the barriers PCPs face to participating in VBP models from those who have not joined them and identify potential solutions.

Methods

Interviews with 12 PCPs in leadership positions and other primary care management experts and focus groups with 17 frontline PCPs with no prior participation in VBP primary care models.

Key Findings and Conclusion

PCPs’ enthusiasm for VBP models is tempered by financial barriers, the PCP workforce shortage, and imperfect performance measures. Suggested solutions to the financial challenges include sufficient upfront primary care payments from the models and ensuring health systems transfer the value-based payments to frontline primary care practices. Solutions to the PCP workforce shortage include increasing payments, boosting supports for PCPs, and investing in primary care trainees. PCPs felt that current performance measures could be improved by swapping out condition-specific metrics for metrics that support access and continuity of primary care.

How do you apply evidence?

Take our quick four-question survey to help us curate evidence and insights that serve you.

Take our survey