How Retailers Responded to Taxes on Sweetened Beverages: A Tale of Two Cities

How Retailers Responded to Taxes on Sweetened Beverages: A Tale of Two Cities

Published: Sep 16, 2019
Publisher: Cambridge, MA: Mathematica
Associated Project

Multi-City Evaluation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage (SSB) Taxes

Time frame: 2016-2019

Prepared for:

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

To curb the intake of sweetened beverages and boost city revenue, two cities—Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Oakland, California—imposed excise taxes on the distribution of sweetened beverages in 2017. This issue brief discusses how beverage retailers implemented the taxes, including who provided the guidance they received onhow to implement the taxes and how they changed beverage prices. It also discusses how retailers responded to the taxes, including how they changed other product prices, store inventory, and marketing strategies. Although there is a growing body of literature on the effects of sweetened beverage taxes on consumer behavior, few studies to date have explored beverage retailers’ implementation of and responses to the tax. Examining the retailer experience can shed light on the actions of a key group that can influence whether consumers buy the taxed beverages or choose healthier substitutes—which in turn determines the efficacy of these kinds of taxes, as intended by policymakers.

Follow the Evidence

Interested in the most current findings from Mathematica? Subscribe to our bi-weekly newsletter, Evidence & Insights, to stay up to date with the issues that matter to you.

Sign Me Up