Are Electronic Medical Records Helpful for Care Coordination? Experiences of Physician Practices

Are Electronic Medical Records Helpful for Care Coordination? Experiences of Physician Practices

Journal Article
Published: Mar 01, 2010
Publisher: Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 25, issue 3
Download
Authors

Joy M. Grossman

Genna R. Cohen

Nicole M. Kemper

Hoangmai H. Pham

Key Findings
There is a gap between policy-makers’ expectation of, and clinical practitioners’ experience with, current electronic medical records’ ability to support coordination of care. Policymakers could expand current health information technology policies to support assessment of how well the technology facilitates tasks necessary for coordination. By reforming payment policy to include care coordination, policymakers could encourage the evolution of EMR technology to include capabilities that support coordination, for example, allowing for inter-practice data exchange and multi-provider clinical decision support.
Six major themes emerged: (1) EMRs facilitate within-office care coordination, chiefly by providing access to data during patient encounters and through electronic messaging; (2) EMRs are less able to support coordination between clinicians and settings, in part due to their design and a lack of standardization of key data elements required for information exchange; (3) managing information overflow from EMRs is a challenge for clinicians; (4) clinicians believe current EMRs cannot adequately capture the medical decision-making process and future care plans to support coordination; (5) realizing EMRs’ potential for facilitating coordination requires evolution of practice operational processes; (6) current fee-for-service reimbursement encourages EMR use for documentation of billable events (office visits, procedures) and not of care coordination (which is not a billable activity).

How do you apply evidence?

Take our quick four-question survey to help us curate evidence and insights that serve you.

Take our survey